Get Out + some notable sci-fi debuts

GetOutDirector: Jordan Peele. Starring: Daniel Kaluuya, Allison Williams,  Katherine Keener. Budget: $4.5 mln. Box office: $252 mln. USA, 2017. IMDb: 7.8. My rating: 3.5/4. Social commentary with elements of thriller, horror and sci-fi.

– The mind is a terrible thing to waste.
 (a quote from the movie and the motto of the United Negro College Fund)

– If there’s too many white people I get nervous.
(one of the main characters)

There were, without doubt, some prominent sci-fi debuts that marked the history of cinema, like…

  • Mad Max” (which I don’t really like a lot, but it was hugely influential)
  • Silent Running” (which was undeniably cool in 1972 but didn’t age well)
  • THX 1138” (a disturbing art form of ”1984” by George Lucas, which wasn’t received well but that changed later, as it often happens with dystopias).

There was a huge wave of many good low-budget independent debuts released recently, such as…

…and many other cool flicks. Some of them had mighty figures behind or even directly involved in the production, for example..

Finally, there were some weird and hard to classify sci-fi debuts like…

A full list will be published soon. Anyway.

I doubt whether “Get Out” will become a cult movie like some of these, but it’s an oddball and perfectly crafted movie, mixing all the genres – a bit of comedy, a slice of horror, some sci-fi – all wrapped into a caustic social commentary.

Also, I wouldn’t call it a horror, rather a thriller. It’s not that scary and has little to do with what is intended as modern horror (luckily!) where people like to go in the dark basements and put their limbs in dark holes.

And Samuel L. Jackson’s rant about casting black British actors when plenty of Americans were available is incredible indeed… but more about that later.

The plot. It’s exactly the case when the less you know the better. Don’t watch the trailer, as it shows too much. So, a young Afro American (Daniel Kaluuya) is going to visit for the first time his white girlfriend’s (Allison Williams) parents (Katherine Keener and Bradley Whitford). He is pretty nervous about that although Rose assures him there’s nothing to worry about. But it takes little time to turn everything into a nightmare…

Jordan Peele

Jordan Peele, the mastermind behind ”Get Out”.

The production. Jordan Peele and Keegan-Michael Key are the creators of comedy sketch series named, guess what, Key & Peele. The show has been running around for 5 seasons and had a good success and a bunch of awards. As Wolfman’s Cult Film Club said, “It’s a comedy sketch show, so it’s pretty fast paced hit and miss sketches. Five seasons, loads on YT. Worth a trying a few. “Alien Imposters” and “Mexican Standoff” and “Dubstep” are a good place to start.” Well, they are indeed hit and miss, and I’m glad Peele took his directional debut in a different direction, although with sketches like “Alien Imposters” you can see the roots for “Get Out”. Check some of these sketches here:


What I liked. Jordan Peele is brave (or smart) enough in not trying to copy Spike Lee rather develop his own style. For whose who fear that “Get Out” is a full version grown out of scetches – no, it isn’t. The movie is very tense, even when nothing is happening and a scene is supposed to be easy-going, you can feel something heavy in the air. That’s good. Contrary to the sketches, the film maintains its minimalism till the very end, which will eventually bring us to a bloody and satisfying climax.

The performances are superb. Really. The cast made this movie. It’s the first feature film for Allison Williams (whose almost double-role performance reminded me Rosamund Pike). All the white cast of the movie matched exactly the tone of the movie. Maybe just Caleb Landry Jones tried too hard to create an updated version of Alex from “A Clockwork Orange”, but that’s a minor complaint. But who really brought everything to the next level is the black cast of the film, who had a very difficult role. Daniel Kaluuya, Betty Gabriel, Marcus Henderson.

What I didn’t like. There were some occasional moments and secondary characters that at times felt little bit off the general mood of the film, but that’s a minor complaint.

Another thing that makes me somehow perplex about this movie is that I’m not sure I’d like to see again. I don’t really mean that it makes it a one-trick pony – of course no – but… that makes me feel strange.

The reception. “Get Out” will be remembered not only as one the best films of 2017, but one of the most successful debuts ever at least commercially. It’s one of dozen movies with a 99%/100% rating on RT basing on 280 reviews (!) and is currently ranked as 4th best movie EVER (!!!).

I would’t be that positive about this movie, but still. $4.5 mln budget vs $252 mln box office. That is very impressive for this kind of film. Long live, Jordan Peele and you new cinematic career. The movie was received very well by the public too. ”38% of the film’s opening weekend audience was African American, while 35% was white, with Georgia being its most profitable market”.

Check out some other reviews of the film by these blogs that will provide some good insight.

Of course, this kind of movie caused some controversies, but let me be honest – who gives a shit? Well, it was surprising to find out that some notable African American actors like Samuel L. Jackson (whom I deeply respect) do give a shit, criticizing that a British black actor was chosen for the main role.

“American brother … really feels that,” said Jackson. “Daniel grew up in a country where they’ve been interracial dating for a hundred years. What would a brother from America have made of that role?” Later Jackson clarified his comments, saying his target was the industry itself, and not his fellow black actors. “It was not a slam against them, but it was just a comment about how Hollywood works in an interesting sort of way sometimes,” he told the Associated Press.


Now, I don’t live in the US, rather in a developed European country where most non-European immigrants are considered people of lower class (often due to their poor education and little willingness to adopt new customs). For me, films like these seem almost unique because they combine the entertaining element with an important social commentary. How many movies like that were made that are not historical dramas and can be viewed and understood by an average teenager? Heck, even if you don’t give a fuck about the racism, the film is just stunning to watch.

Some reviewers criticized the movie for a) portraying all white people in a bad light b) copying “The Stepford Wives” and several other movies. Both arguments are ridiculous, because almost every movie that is out is in some way resembling or copying some other movie. So let’s stop watching movies now? Copying and being inspired by are so different. Well… haters gonna hate, don’t they. Important movies like “The Stepford Wives”, ”Lobster” and ”Invasion of the Body Snatchers” have certainly a similar vein as ”Get Out”, but nobody isn’t copying anything here. I don’t see anything wrong with taking good ideas and making them shine in a new light.hatersWorth watching? Yes. Whether you like or not the whole story (I’m pretty sure my grandma won’t like it), let’s face it – “Get Out” is almost an exemplary thriller with stunning photography, excellent acting and well-built tense pacing. I certainly discovered several names to follow, and Daniel Kaluuya proved once again that he can be just amazing. He expresses a whole array of emotions in a minimal and reserved way (although more expressive than in the Black Mirror episode he did) and that is always a sign of a big talent. I am pretty sure that ”Get Out” will be later found in various “best of 2017” lists. Not a total masterpiece, though, but it’s impressive film. Fresh and original.

“Get Out” is rare example of a film that successfully combines multiple genres, is striking both visually and technically despite being made on a shoestring budget. But what is most important is that this debut by Jordan Peele (who also has a mixed family background, his mother is white and his father is black),  finally combines all these traits to tell a story that is so relevant for many people here, in our real world.

Watch also: ”Invasion of the Body Snatchers” and ”The Lobster” (for social commentary blended with sci-fi), ”Resolution” (for an unusual take on the genres), ”The Stepford Wives”.


P. S. Here’s a funny parody trailer on the film, called, guess what, ”Get In”. Watch it only if you have seen the original movie though.

12 thoughts on “Get Out + some notable sci-fi debuts

  1. Great post. It was interesting reading your thoughts. For me, there is no denying that Get Out tried to simulate the type of horror found in Rosemary’s Baby and The Stepford Wives – it is only too evident that the same thing is going on there, and the director admitted it. The film is brave to do so, and it puts its own spin on the story. I still don’t think it has the complexity and intelligence of such gems as “Donnie Darko” that aged very well, and I just wish I have “Get Out” without its ending – it is just an almost perfect film for me that way.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yes! You exactly nailed the pointed I was trying to make, when I said that I don’t feel like rewatching it. It’s good as thriller and social commentary, shot well but essentially not a deep movie. This is why rating it as 4th best movie of all time of course is an exaggeration and I didn’t give it 4/4.

      Donnie Darko is a masterpiece, Get Out is just a very, very good movie.

      Liked by 1 person

      • I probably meant that as with 1984, V for Vendetta, etc. we can glimpse in that world the same patters present here, in our world, such as the pressure and expectation to be in a couple, the societal norms around awkward dating processes, etc.


  2. Pretty comprehensive review and analysis. Get Out is a great example of how modern horror has gotten progressively weirder and riskier these past few years, which, generally speaking, I think is a good thing (e.g. It Follows, Don’t Breathe, etc.). I think the social commentary of these films work better given how bizarre or grindhouse they feel — basically the modern equivalents of exploitation films Quentin Tarantino used to watch.

    The sheer profitability of these films, particularly those made by Blumhouse, makes me wonder why more studios haven’t tried to make official anthology series out of these modestly budgeted, popular features. “Cinematic Universes” are all the rage these days, and when you have Universal Studios attempting to make an action-packed mega-franchise out of their classical monster movies (e.g. Frankenstein, the Wolfman, the Mummy), instead of emphasizing the popularity of what are essentially modern grindhouse films, it baffles me.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thanks for stopping by! Yes, Blumhouse was incredibly successful with their productions, and the part I like most is that they still keep the budgets low (just several movies had $10 mln in last years). You’re right about the studios… “The Mummy” was a great (awful, actually) example of how to blow a big budget.

      I also think that by wrapping this social commentary films into a different genre they manage to reach more people.

      What are your thoughts about Samuel L. Jackson’s rant?


      • I don’t have many thoughts, actually. Most actors’ social commentaries are way, way overblown, in my opinion, and I don’t really care whether roles go to English, Australian, American, or Swedish actors. I suppose SLJ’s comments indicate just how international the talent pool is that Hollywood draws from for its acting, not to mention its directing, screenwriting, producing, and all other aspects of filmmaking. Money and fame attract all corners of the globe.

        Liked by 1 person

  3. Glad you liked this one! I did like it & liked that it felt like it was trying to do something a bit different. I’m one of those who complained a little bit that it was too close to The Stepford Wives (and Society – have you seen that?! Haha – that’s messed up. Also, The Skeleton Key). But it didn’t make me not like Get Out – I thought it still managed to make the film feel unique, just not as “groundbreaking” as people made it out to be. But so much better than most the mainstream crap that gets made. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    • I read you review. 😉 No, I haven’t seen Society, how is that?

      Groundbreaking it’s not for sure, but I think the fact that it speaks about important issues in an unusual way is good already. 😉


  4. […] “Get Out” was creepy, but it wasn’t really a horror. A good tense thriller? Yes. As Jay said, “…Peele isn’t exactly trying to horrify you; he’s trying to unsettle you. And he’s doing that exceedingly well.” I love the film and it was a nice debut, so lets just mention it had $252,434,250 which is a lot for a film like that. […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.