Director: Denis Velleneuve. Starring: Amy Adams, Forest Whitaker, Jeremy Renner. USA, 2016. IMDB: 8.0. My rating: 4/4. Science fiction poetry.arrival

– If you could see your whole life from start to finish, would you change things?
– Maybe I’d say what I felt more often. I-I don’t know.
(conversation between main characters)

Arrival is a beautiful reminder that when we gaze at the stars we actually look at ourselves. Shot mostly in dark colours, it is full of internal light. It is a poem, a reflection, a meditation. A story about the most valuable things we have, our fears and desires. About humility, our (in)ability to hear each other and what makes us human. The visual style of the movie tries to bring up Tarkovski’s movies – and not many modern science fiction movies can be proud of that. Still, ”Arrival” combines that in a modern and accessible way that makes the film not an art-house experiment but rather a story for all of us, if we let it in our heart. ”Arrival” is that kind of film that even though not perfect but it makes you feel ashamed for having even a slightest intention to criticize it.


Our world. 12 alien spaceships suddenly land on Earth. Nothing happens, The aliens don’t 20170329_013608go out of the ships, they don’t initiate the communication, seemingly not interested in it. Linguistics professor Louise Banks (Amy Adams) is invited to establish the contact with the help of the scientist Ian Donnely (Jeremy Renner), all under the control of the military headed by Colonel Weber (Forest Whitaker).

What makes the ”Arrival” really important is that here the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. 

The sad part is that even with all the acclaim and success it received, I saw many viewers complaining about some plot inconsistencies, technical solutions, ambiguous ending, etc. It seems that many people lost exactly that small but important felling the movie is trying to deliver. There are some things you can feel with your intuition, heart, but not logic. ”Arrival” is exactly the case when one has the right to say all this seemingly naive and romantic stuff, 20170329_013539because from the technical point of view it is brilliant. It feels genuine. I wish we would learn more how to feel things. Like ”Solaris”, these stories need to be felt. Remember, how you walked on a street in spring, when everything starts to bloom and suddenly you feel different?


20170329_013639The film brings various ideas to the viewers. One of them is an curious concept of ”linguistic relativity”. It states that the language you speak affects the way you see the world, thus knowing more languages expands your comprehension of life. Many scientists call these theories controversial. I would like to point one thing out though. One thing is speaking the language. Another is speaking it on a daily basis. And another thing yet would be speaking it continuously on a daily basis for years almost without using your native language (in case of immigration).  How many of these scientists have actually tested and tried the third option? I have experienced it by myself. Another concept the film introduces is completely different understanding of time. Some of these elements were explored before, for example, in a wonderful novel ”A Stranger in a Strange Land” by R. Heinlein.  “Arrival” could analyzed deeply from different points of view as it offers a lot of thoughtful material, but I feel it would deserve another article then.

20170329_012959Many compared “Arrival” to “Contact”. That is not devoid of sense, but the mood in both movies is different. If “Contact” shared somehow the elevated spirit of “Forrest Gump” (both directed by Zemeckis), then “Arrival” feels more  like a modern and more accessible reminiscence of “Solaris” (1972) or “Stalker” – dark and gloomy, but with a bright light shining through. Visually it is more refined and elaborated as well than Zemeckis’ film (that is also a wonderful movie).

The trailers, of course, were pretty different from what we actually see. That is fine, since the movie was produced by Paramount. ”Arrival” is anything but a slick sci-fi blockbuster. That was predictable since the director is a wonderful Canadian guy Denis Villeneuve, a rising star (”Incendies”, ”Prisoners”, ”Enemy”, ”Sicario” – all remarkable movies he directed). The film is very fragile and not perfect (even Villeneuve himself admitted this). But the things it20170329_013123 is showing simply do not allow me to be too critical with it. Let’s put aside all the stuff that is usually said about a good film – acting, photography, etc. You will find it all here on very high levels. What makes the ”Arrival” really important is that here the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.


20170329_013721The light and music intertwine and are touching. The movie is very dark and pretty minimal, but it is stunning how through these bleak and monotone colours you can see an immense amount of light. The sound is chosen very carefully and is very minimal, exactly how it should be. It operates with subtle sounds and noises that help to create the atmosphere. A long-time collaborator of Villeneuve Jóhann Jóhansson is responsible for the soundtrack.

For such a dark and minimal movie, it is touching to see an immense amount of light shining through.

Probably the most impressive part of the movie is the alien part – the spaceships, the aliens and how the interaction occurs. This is pure magic. The designers did an incredible job to make it all real. The way hectapods communicate could be easily a form of art itself. By the20170329_013625 way, Villeneuve said in an interview that the green screen was used only once during the shooting, thus putting actors in a real environment. This is his preferred way of working as he mentioned. Currently he is filming ”Bladerunner 2049” using a similar approach.

20170329_012635The movie collected an impressive cast. Ady Adams, Jeremy Renner, Forest Whitaker – all are wonderful here. Most of the movie’s weight rests, of course, on Adams – and she bears it impressively. But the mighty and heavy performance of Whitaker is also worth noting. He has a simple role but his powerful acting is impressive. The script is based on ”Story of Your Life” by Ted Chiang. The movie took slightly a different direction trying to expand the story (it is very short and can be read in half an hour) and did it well considering it was a difficult material to film.

Worth watching? ”Arrival” is a heartfelt story that behind linguistics, gloom and aliens is hiding the most important things about ourselves. A must-see for anyone interested in cinema and one of the most curious and important events in cinema of past few years. Instant sci-fi classics.


8 thoughts on “Arrival

    • Yes. Sadly I found out many people didn’t get get and that makes me feel down a little because this movie was full of love and compassion (and lots of other things as well of course). I don’t say it’s an easy watch, but it is original. I really admire Villeneuve… Have you watched his other movies?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Yeah, a woman at work was talking about Arrival with me and she didn’t like it & called it pretentious. *sigh* Which is why it’s nice to find bloggers with similar taste in films. : ) Yes, I’ve seen Enemy which I thought was decent. I didn’t love Prisoners. But, after Arrival, I watched Sicario. Thought it was fantastic even though it’s not a genre I tend to go for. His films are beautiful. I’m definitely becoming a fan.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Yes, “Arrival” was pretty complex, but that is fine, not everything should be your everyday Coca-Cola… I watched it 2 times in 2 days, a thing I rarely do 🙂

        Enemy was very impressive indeed. I can’t say I really looooved Sicario, I felt it was a little muddy, although the screenplay and the performances were very good.

        What are your thoughts on Prisoners?


  1. […] Dreamy and poignant posters for several films of the great Russian director, by Curzon Artificial Eye. These are definitely most beautiful posters of his works I have ever seen (including probably the original posters)  as they reflect carefully the poetic nature of these films, which continue to influence modern filmmakers, such as Dennis Vileneuve who directed the best science fiction movie of 2016, ”Arrival”. […]


  2. […] And the new batsuit? It’s prettu cool! Although I don’t get why Batman needed shining eyes. There’s a lot of awesomeness in this film, which however stops the same moment as… the characters stop fighting and start talking! Hugging, moaming, kissing, put whatever you want here… oh, boy! It is so pretentious. Amy Adams was particularly annoying – nothing in common with her marvellous performance in “Arrival“. […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.